Author summary
97% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Daniel Davidson results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Slippery Slope , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 3,417 hits . Analysis detected 31,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,021 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,402 of 6,359 authors). This John Daniel Davidson is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. John Daniel Davidson
Author details
Total words: 15,021
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.0% percentile 4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 20.8% 20.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.8% 22.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 15.5% 15.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.8% 20.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 20.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.8%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 15.5%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst