BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 881 faulty-reasoning hits from 843 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,122 of 20,517 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the article peer group.

Gov. 
Mikie has some more explaining to do. 
The U.S. 
Department of Justice would like some more details on New Jersey’s voter registration debacle in which a “software error” reportedly led to some 6,600 noncitizens being added to the Garden State’s voter rolls in 2023 and 2024. 
Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, is giving New Jersey Gov. 
Mikie Sherrill and Lt. 
Gov. 
Dale Caldwell five business days to turn over “additional information to assess New Jersey’s compliance with various federal statutes.” 
The Justice Department previously requested information about New Jersey’s dirty voter rolls in a July 7 letter to Caldwell, who also serves as secretary of state and oversees its Division of Elections. 
Now, the stakes are suddenly significantly higher. 
‘Preserve Any and All Records’ 
Dhillon wants the names of the 6,600 individuals identified  their "full names, dates of birth, nationalities, residential addresses, and registration dates and locations." 
Sherrill divulged the “glitch” Tuesday at a press conference in which she unironically accused President Donald Trump of making “bizarre conspiracy theories about fraud with no evidence” as the Democrat announced evidence of noncitizens on her state’s voting rolls. 
She noted that about 400 of the 6,600 foreign nationals went on to vote in New Jersey elections. 
Dhillon also wants Jersey election officials to detail to the DOJ "when and where" the noncitizens voted and provide the certification and signature, required under New Jersey law, for those who voted by mail ballot. 
“Additionally, please treat this correspondence as a request to preserve any and all records relating to today’s disclosure,” Dhillon wrote. 
The Justice Department simultaneously offered an update on the new developments to the district court presiding over its lawsuit  United States v. 
Caldwell  seeking New Jersey’s unredacted voter rolls. 
‘Registered Them to Vote Anyway’ 
Like several other blue state governors, Sherrill has railed against the lawsuit, accusing Trump of trying to “weaponize elections for political gain.” 
New Jersey has rebuffed the Justice Department’s voter list requests, asserting that the state is “committed to protecting the privacy of our state’s residents and we will defend against this lawsuit in court.” 
Sean Higgins, the governor’s spokesman, told several media outlets that the Trump administration has a "long history of weaponizing" in attempts to “overturn election results.” 
"Governor Sherrill has been clear that she will use all the legal tools available to her to protect New Jerseyans' personal information," Higgins said, reiterating Sherrill’s criticism of the France-based software vendor and her Democrat predecessor’s administration. 
They’re to blame, Sherrill claimed at Tuesday’s press conference. 
But the tech company, IDEMIA, told the New York Post that New Jersey officials had access to the same information on the noncitizens “but apparently registered them to vote anyway.” 
Reportedly, the software the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC) used to automatically register individuals to vote when applying for driver’s licenses and other ID failed to block the noncitizens from the list even though the applicants noted on their forms that they were not U.S. citizens. 
“The 6,600 records submitted to the [MVC] and Division of Elections contained correct information according to the design specifications as set out by the state,” Lisa Shoemaker, an IDEMIA spokeswoman, told the Post on Wednesday. 
“All 6,600 individuals indicated ‘Yes’ to wanting to register to vote and ‘NO’ to being a US Citizen,” she added. 
“This information was recorded correctly and always available,” she added. 
More than two dozen states and the District of Columbia use similar automatic registration systems, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. 
‘Illegally Diluted’ 
Department of Homeland Security reviews found more than 35,000 potential noncitizens on New Jersey’s voter rolls. 
The DOJ analyzed voter registration data from four states  New Jersey, California, Nevada and Pennsylvania  and said it found more than 250,000 potential noncitizens on their rolls. 
In California, the number was nearly 191,000. 
Sherrill says her administration has launched an independent investigation. 
New Jersey Assembly Republican Leader John DiMaio is calling for a thorough audit and new election integrity safeguards. 
“New Jersey Republicans have been sounding the alarm for years that the automatic voter registration process at the MVC was highly problematic,” DiMaio said in a press release. 
“In 2020 and again in 2025, voters were disenfranchised after the system changed party affiliations. 
When we questioned MVC officials, they refused to disclose how they safeguard the process. 
Trenton Democrats have continued to undermine public trust in our elections, and it’s time for change.” 
Democrats have labeled an election integrity bill  the SAVE America Act  “Jim Crow 2.0.” 
They insist that a law aimed at ensuring only U.S. citizens vote in U.S. elections will disenfranchise voters. 
But that’s exactly what New Jersey’s voter registration “glitch” did, canceling out the votes of some 400 legal voters  a point Dhillon emphasized in her request to Sherrill and Caldwell. 
“Ensuring that U.S. citizens' votes are not illegally diluted by noncitizens' votes is of paramount importance,” the assistant attorney general wrote. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%M.D. Kittle: 6.6%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%M.D. Kittle: 2.4%The Federalist: 3.4%Availability Heuristic1.9%This article: 2.7%M.D. Kittle: 0.9%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 1.8%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.8%This article: 1.2%M.D. Kittle: 1.2%The Federalist: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 5.2%M.D. Kittle: 7.5%The Federalist: 10.2%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 2.5%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.5%This article: 3.9%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%M.D. Kittle: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%M.D. Kittle: 16.3%The Federalist: 12.2%Negativity Bias15.7%This article: 6.8%M.D. Kittle: 1.0%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 2.0%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%M.D. Kittle: 4.5%The Federalist: 4.0%In-Group Bias1.9%This article: 1.1%M.D. Kittle: 2.1%The Federalist: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 2.1%The Federalist: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.3%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%M.D. Kittle: 0.9%The Federalist: 1.2%Recency Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%M.D. Kittle: 12.0%The Federalist: 5.2%Ad Hominem3.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.0%M.D. Kittle: 5.0%The Federalist: 5.2%Appeal to Authority3.0%This article: 2.1%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 8.2%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.2%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Bandwagon5.2%This article: 6.3%M.D. Kittle: 8.2%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 2.9%The Federalist: 3.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.0%This article: 2.6%M.D. Kittle: 1.1%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque2.6%This article: 1.7%M.D. Kittle: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof1.7%This article: 2.7%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature2.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.6%M.D. Kittle: 1.4%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.6%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.6%M.D. Kittle: 3.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.6%The Federalist: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.6%M.D. Kittle: 21.9%The Federalist: 19.9%Biased Writer Voice3.6%This article: 1.9%M.D. Kittle: 2.6%The Federalist: 5.4%Indoctrination1.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 18.1%The Federalist: 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

843 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers66%attributed speech288writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 35 words • 0.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageSean Higgins • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSean Higgins • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 9 words • 0.0% coverageIDEMIA • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Shoemaker • 35 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Shoemaker • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Shoemaker • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNational Conference of State Legislatures • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJohn DiMaio • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJohn DiMaio • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJohn DiMaio • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJohn DiMaio • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJohn DiMaio • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mikie Sherrill

100%flagged-word coverage
79 attributed words14% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote+49.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mikie Sherrill: 49.4%49.4%Biased Writer Voice-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Mikie Sherrill: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.