Speaker summary
51% 36 analyzed articles/videos 3,643.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikie Sherrill results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 685.09 hits . Analysis detected 6,172.572 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,643.333 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,209 of 28,364 speakers). This Mikie Sherrill is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Mikie Sherrill
Speaker details
Total words: 3,643.333
Article count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score36 analyzed videos3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst