Author summary
33%5 analyzed articles/videos5,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Fitzpatrick results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,587 hits. Analysis detected 11,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,710 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,962 of 6,527 authors). This Edward Fitzpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Edward Fitzpatrick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
9%Edward Fitzpatrick (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,710
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate