Author summary
33% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Fitzpatrick results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,587 hits . Analysis detected 11,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,710 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,962 of 6,527 authors). This Edward Fitzpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Edward Fitzpatrick
Author details
Total words: 18,710
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst