New Jersey Dem Governor Pledges Transparency, Blocks Election Docs Release 38%

By M.D. Kittle71%

7/24/2026, 3:45:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 957 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,646 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the article peer group.

New Jersey Gov. 
Mikie Sherrill unloaded on her predecessor this week in announcing that Garden State election officials found some 6,600 noncitizens on their voter rolls  about 400 of whom voted in elections. 
Democrat Sherrill  a leftist identifying as a moderate  threw under the bus former Gov. 
Phil Murphy, also a Democrat, for “reckless failures” and an absence of transparency. 
“This failure didn’t occur under my watch, but accountability starts now,” the new governor said in a statement. 
“I am taking action to prevent anything like it from occurring in the future and make sure those responsible are held accountable.” 
But the same old transparency problems remain. 
‘Subject to Voter Public Records Laws’ 
An official from the New Jersey Department of State’s Division of Elections said it would not fulfill The Federalist’s request for voter records on the thousands of noncitizens that appeared on the state’s voter registration database. 
The Federalist asked for the files in part to determine party affiliation of the registered noncitizens, particularly the individuals said to have voted. 
Sherrill said the foreign nationals “were registered as Democrats, Republicans, and majority unaffiliated and were scattered across the state.” 
But she has refused to provide anything close to specific numbers. 
Alicia D’Alessandro, senior adviser in the New Jersey Department of State’s communications department, said the information would not be released while a state investigation into the matter continues. 
She could not say when the records would be available to the public. 
While government officials may block the release of records during an ongoing investigation, voting information is a matter of public record under provisions in the National Voter Registration Act. 
“Because voter registration forms and voter lists are government documents, they are often subject to public records laws,” the Election Assistance Commission notes in an explainer on its website. 
Voter files cannot include information about who an individual voted for in any election, but they can “include a voter’s partisan affiliation, which elections the voter participated in, or the voter’s method of voting.” 
The Federalist is filing an open records request with the state for the records. 
‘Preserve Any and All Records’ 
Blocking documents is not a good look for a governor who claims she won’t be like the last guy who wasn’t transparent. 
Sherrill won’t even turn over the information to the Department of Justice, which on Tuesday gave the state five business days to release it. 
As The Federalist reported, Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, is seeking the names of the 6,600 individuals identified  their “full names, dates of birth, nationalities, residential addresses, and registration dates and locations.” 
Sherrill divulged the software“glitch” she claims caused the oversight on Tuesday at a press conference. 
In it, she unironically accused President Donald Trump of making “bizarre conspiracy theories about fraud with no evidence” as the Democrat announced evidence of noncitizens on her state’s voting rolls. 
Dhillon also wants Jersey election officials to detail to the DOJ “when and where” the noncitizens voted and provide the certification and signature, required under New Jersey law, for those who voted by mail ballot. 
“Additionally, please treat this correspondence as a request to preserve any and all records relating to today’s disclosure,” Dhillon wrote. 
Sherrill tried to hide behind her Trump Derangement Syndrome in telling media outlets that her administration has no intention of releasing the information to the DOJ. 
“We are not in the practice of turning over this kind of personally identifying data over to the federal government because we have seen them weaponize it, I’ve seen it personally,” Sherrill told Democracy Docket, operated by Russia Collusion hoax peddler and leftist lawfare kingpin Marc Elias. 
“They are working to weaponize personal data, and they don’t have a reputation for keeping it private either.” 
Election law expert Hans von Spakovsky tells The Federalist Sherrill and New Jersey’s leftist resistance movement don’t have much of a legal leg to stand on. 
Perhaps they should consult the transparency provisions in the National Voter Registration Act (NRVA) and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), he said. 
‘Failure of This Magnitude’ 
“An important point about the New Jersey story is that the 6,600 aliens were those who checked ‘noncitizen’ on the form but were registered by the state anyway. 
And that is how the state was able to find them when it finally realized what was happening,” said von Spakovksy, senior legal fellow with The Edwin Meese III Institute for the Rule of Law at Advancing American Freedom. 
“What we don’t know is how many aliens registered who falsely checked ‘yes’ that they were citizens. 
Since New Jersey does no citizenship verification, we don’t know what that number is. 
But clearly 6,600 is not the total of aliens in New Jersey registered to vote.” 
Lots of questions remain unanswered as Sherrill promises “accountability.’ 
Von Spakovsky’s comments underscore the urgency for passage of the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote. 
Late Friday afternoon Rep. 
Van Drew, R-N.J., and 18 of his House Republican colleagues sent a letter to Sherrill demanding answers. 
“When the state uncovers a failure of this magnitude, it cannot simply acknowledge the problem and move on,” the 2nd District congressman said in a press release. 
“If New Jersey's system failed even when non-citizens openly identified themselves, then the public deserves to know what protections are in place. 
This right here is exactly why we should require ID to vote in our elections. 
We need answers about how this happened, why it was not caught sooner, whether more ineligible registrations remain, and what is being done right now to secure our voter rolls.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.3%M.D. Kittle: 6.2%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias5.3%This article: 2.9%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 9.9%M.D. Kittle: 2.6%The Federalist: 3.5%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 2.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.1%The Federalist: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%M.D. Kittle: 7.1%The Federalist: 10.1%Framing Effect1.0%This article: 1.1%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.1%This article: 0.7%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%M.D. Kittle: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias2.3%This article: 1.6%M.D. Kittle: 0.8%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 24.9%M.D. Kittle: 16.3%The Federalist: 12.4%Negativity Bias24.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.0%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.8%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%M.D. Kittle: 4.1%The Federalist: 3.9%In-Group Bias1.7%This article: 2.7%M.D. Kittle: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.4%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%M.D. Kittle: 1.1%The Federalist: 1.3%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 3.2%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%M.D. Kittle: 11.2%The Federalist: 5.3%Ad Hominem7.5%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%M.D. Kittle: 4.8%The Federalist: 5.0%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 7.4%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma7.4%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.7%The Federalist: 2.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.5%M.D. Kittle: 7.7%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization12.5%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.9%M.D. Kittle: 7.6%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 1.9%M.D. Kittle: 2.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 6.4%M.D. Kittle: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 4.9%M.D. Kittle: 1.2%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque4.9%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.7%M.D. Kittle: 1.3%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.7%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.5%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading2.5%This article: 0.0%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.3%M.D. Kittle: 3.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote12.3%This article: 1.4%M.D. Kittle: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 21.4%M.D. Kittle: 20.5%The Federalist: 19.7%Biased Writer Voice21.4%This article: 3.9%M.D. Kittle: 2.4%The Federalist: 5.2%Indoctrination3.9%This article: 3.1%M.D. Kittle: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.1%This article: 17.0%M.D. Kittle: 17.3%The Federalist: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias17.0%This article: 2.5%M.D. Kittle: 0.3%The Federalist: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

957 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers64%attributed speech341writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageNew Jersey Department of State’s Division of Elections • 36 words • 100.0% coverageThe Federalist • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageAlicia D’Alessandro • 28 words • 0.0% coverageAlicia D’Alessandro • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageElection Assistance Commission • 29 words • 0.0% coverageElection Assistance Commission • 34 words • 0.0% coverageThe Federalist • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 35 words • 0.0% coverageHarmeet Dhillon • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 47 words • 100.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 26 words • 100.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 28 words • 0.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 39 words • 0.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageHans von Spakovsky • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageVan Drew • 27 words • 0.0% coverageVan Drew • 22 words • 0.0% coverageVan Drew • 15 words • 100.0% coverageVan Drew • 30 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mikie Sherrill

100%flagged-word coverage
65 attributed words11% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Unattributed Quote+51.5 ptsWriter: 20.8%Mikie Sherrill: 72.3%72.3%Politically Right Leaning +45.9 ptsWriter: 26.4%Mikie Sherrill: 72.3%72.3%Biased Writer Voice+36.5 ptsWriter: 35.8%Mikie Sherrill: 72.3%72.3%Politically Left Leaning B-8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%Mikie Sherrill: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Mikie Sherrill: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Mikie Sherrill: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.