Topic summary
50%112 analyzed articles/videos38,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Integrity results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 39,545 hits. Analysis detected 377,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 311,097 analyzed words across 112 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,588 of 15,763 topics). This Election Integrity is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score112 analyzed articles311.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Michigan City Council Member With Violent Past Charged With Election Fraud27%
The Federalist89%By M.D. Kittle72%7/24/2026, 11:21:24 AM
Alaska sends 3,000 letters asking voters to verify their citizenship ahead of this year's elections31%
WRAL.com44%By BECKY BOHRER — Associated Press36%7/23/2026, 11:43:11 PM
Trump’s Distorted Venezuela Elections Claim2%
FactCheck.org3%By Robert Farley4%7/23/2026, 8:01:44 PM
Election Deniers’ Grip on the Republican Party Strengthens in Arizona61%
TPM – Talking Points Memo89%By Khaya Himmelman7/23/2026, 6:00:00 PM
'Conspiracy of silence' critics urge CIA director to 'stand up to Trump' or 'resign'66%
Raw Story93%By Tom Boggioni87%7/23/2026, 12:34:25 PM
California AG Rob Bonta rigs language in Voter ID initiative61%
New York Post89%By Jon Fleischman76%7/23/2026, 12:57:10 AM
Fact-checking Mullin’s claim that foreign adversaries can access voting machines20%
PolitiFact4%By Loreben Tuquero31%7/22/2026, 10:25:36 PM
It Sure Looks Like California Democrats Are Trying to Rig the Upcoming Voter ID Initiative Vote81%
townhall.com85%By Amy Curtis90%7/22/2026, 8:00:24 AM
Non-Citizen Voting Scandal Gets Worse: Software Giant Blames Election Officials, CA Gets Dragged In75%
RedState91%By Rusty Weiss90%7/22/2026, 7:15:00 AM
Democrats’ ’secure elections’ claims falling apart before our eyes81%
American Thinker93%By Wendi Strauch Mahoney0%7/22/2026, 4:00:00 AM