Topic summary
50% 112 analyzed articles/videos 38,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Integrity results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 39,545 hits . Analysis detected 377,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 311,097 analyzed words across 112 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,588 of 15,763 topics). This Election Integrity is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Election Integrity
Topic details
Total words: 311,097
Article count: 112
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score112 analyzed articles311.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst