Author summary
90% 28 analyzed articles/videos 11,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Curtis results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 11,488 hits . Analysis detected 93,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,533 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,769 of 6,170 authors). This Amy Curtis is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Amy Curtis
Author details
Total words: 46,533
Article count: 28
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.7% BS Score28 analyzed articles46.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 22.2% 22.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.7% 24.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.7% 16.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 22.2%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst