Townhall⁠85%

Secretary of State Rubio Gave the Best Explanation for Why Iran Is in a 'Shambles' ⁠95%

By Amy Curtis⁠89%

7/20/2026, 9:00:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 369 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,176 of 20,517 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the article peer group.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has done a fantastic job of articulating some of the biggest geopolitical issues impacting America today, including communism and left-wing violence. 
He also recently explained why Iran is such a mess. 
"I mean, Iran's economy is in a shambles," Rubio said. "300 percent inflation, particularly on life-sustaining goods. 
They have dwindling revenues to meet even their own payroll, they have food shortages, they have a drought which we didn't cause, and they have a gasoline shortage, a fuel shortage." 
"All of these problems existed before all this began; they've just gotten worse. 
They will continue to get worse. 
And one of the reasons why Iran is in a shambles. 
This is a rich country. 
Iran is a rich country," he continued. 
"One of the reasons why Iran is in a shambles is because every penny that this regime ever gets—be it through sanctions relief or through the oil they're able to get out—they invest it in Hezbollah. 
They invest in Hamas. 
They spend billions of dollars supporting militias in Iraq, Hezbollah, and Hamas." 
"They should be spending billions of dollars supporting the people of Iran. 
They should be spending billions of dollars building their country. 
But instead, they use it to sponsor terrorism. 
So I think there's a growing awareness of that inside of Iran, and I think there's even a growing awareness among some of the people in their government. 
In fact, we have heard that from some of the people in their government," Rubio said. 
Yes. 
The regime needs to crack and be broken. 
The U.S. has carried out strikes against Iran for more than a week, following the dissolution of the Memorandum of Understanding and Iranian attacks in Jordan that killed two service members. 
Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. 
Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 
Help us report the truth about the Trump administration's decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 30.1%Amy Curtis: 8.4%Townhall: 5.2%Confirmation Bias30.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.9%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Amy Curtis: 3.6%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic8.9%This article: 3.3%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.5%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Amy Curtis: 2.1%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 9.8%Amy Curtis: 10.8%Townhall: 11.4%Framing Effect9.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.4%Townhall: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.3%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.1%Amy Curtis: 1.0%Townhall: 1.5%Optimism Bias11.1%This article: 10.0%Amy Curtis: 2.8%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias10.0%This article: 47.7%Amy Curtis: 15.2%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias47.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 3.9%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 4.6%Townhall: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Amy Curtis: 6.0%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.1%This article: 7.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 1.9%Halo Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Amy Curtis: 1.3%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Amy Curtis: 8.3%Townhall: 5.1%Ad Hominem2.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 4.3%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.0%Amy Curtis: 4.2%Townhall: 4.5%Appeal to Authority7.0%This article: 17.6%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 2.0%False Dilemma17.6%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.7%Amy Curtis: 16.5%Townhall: 9.2%Hasty Generalization12.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.5%Amy Curtis: 1.6%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon3.5%This article: 17.9%Amy Curtis: 9.7%Townhall: 11.3%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 10.0%Amy Curtis: 3.0%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question10.0%This article: 29.8%Amy Curtis: 2.8%Townhall: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)29.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 1.5%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.3%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.6%Burden of Proof4.3%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.2%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal12.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.1%Amy Curtis: 2.3%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.4%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.9%Amy Curtis: 4.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote11.9%This article: 4.6%Amy Curtis: 2.4%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection4.6%This article: 10.6%Amy Curtis: 24.5%Townhall: 16.3%Biased Writer Voice10.6%This article: 5.7%Amy Curtis: 8.0%Townhall: 5.7%Indoctrination5.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Amy Curtis: 21.9%Townhall: 14.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.5%This article: 9.8%Amy Curtis: 6.1%Townhall: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.8%

369 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers63%attributed speech138writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 17 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 31 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 36 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall VIP • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

100%flagged-word coverage
216 attributed words94% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.3 ptsWriter: 28.3%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+20.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco Rubio: 20.4%20.4%Indoctrination-15.2 ptsWriter: 15.2%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.2 ptsWriter: 15.2%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+7.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco Rubio: 7.9%7.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.