Speaker summary
67% 163 analyzed articles/videos 12,058.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marco Rubio results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,202.493 hits . Analysis detected 15,897.769 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,058.333 analyzed words across 163 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,679 of 25,752 speakers). This Marco Rubio is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Marco Rubio
Speaker details
Total words: 12,058.333
Content count: 163
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score163 analyzed videos12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst