Speaker summary
24%10 analyzed articles/videos3,276.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Brookings Institution results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Blind-Spot Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 1.4% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 163 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 0% (25,757 of 25,757 speakers). This The Brookings Institution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
The Brookings Institution
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
0.6% BS Score10 analyzed videos3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often