Speaker summary
24%10 analyzed articles/videos3,276.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Brookings Institution results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Blind-Spot Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 1.4% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 163 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 0% (25,757 of 25,757 speakers). This The Brookings Institution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
The Brookings Institution
Speaker details
Total words: 3,276.333
Article count: 10
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.6% BS Score10 analyzed videos3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate