The emotional turmoil Americans face after moving abroad 26%

By Nicole Karlis0%

7/11/2026, 10:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 1,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,245 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (15,806 of 21,172 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the article peer group.

In September 2025, Ruby Mora, a 34-year-old from Pennsylvania, packed her bags and moved to the Netherlands with her husband. 
As a neurodivergent Puerto Rican-Mexican woman, she didn’t feel safe in Trump’s America anymore. 
A community effort helped her finance the relocation and she also secured a visa called DAFT (Dutch-American Friendship Treaty), allowing her to live and work in the Netherlands as a self-employed entrepreneur. 
While she is just starting to feel settled today, nearly a year later, she never would have expected the complicated and challenging emotions that would surface after the move  and how long they’d last. 
“The biggest emotion for me has to be grief, but specifically migratory grief,” Mora said. 
“And the other major feeling is the guilt; it’s just been this heavy guilt that is like, why should I get to be here and not my loved ones, not my friends, or colleagues?” 
Related 
Parenting in America is hard. 
Italy showed me another way 
According to research from The Brookings Institution , a record number of Americans are leaving the United States. 
In 2025, the country experienced net negative migration for the first time in at least half a century, meaning more people left the country than entered. 
But for those who choose to leave, they’ve been met with unexpected emotional turbulence. 
After the initial excitement wears off, many people face loneliness, sadness, guilt and grief  aspects of the move that aren’t often discussed before one. 
As a result, a cottage industry of mental health “expat therapists” has emerged, helping people navigate these complex emotions of moving abroad. 
Janaline Smalman, an expat therapist and founder of Healing Art Journey, said it’s common for people who move abroad to struggle with unexpected, challenging emotions for a variety of reasons. 
“People expect excitement,” Smalman, who has lived and worked in 13 different countries, said. 
“What actually shows up is messier.” 
“People expect excitement  What actually shows up is messier.” 
She said there’s grief for the people, routines and even a person’s identity that’s been left behind. 
And as Mora experienced, there’s guilt. 
“Especially around leaving family, and anger at how much harder ordinary tasks suddenly are,” Smalman said. 
“Then there’s comparison: near-constant, measuring of the new place against the old one, and there’s a loss of identity that catches people off guard.” 
In America, Americans knew how life functioned. 
But when someone moves abroad, they’re starting from zero. 
Smalman said this can be especially challenging for Americans. 
“Americans often come from a culture built on independence, productivity and self-reliance,” she said. 
“When everyday tasks suddenly require help, or take three times as long because of language or unfamiliar systems, it can feel disorienting in a way that catches people off guard.” 
Enikö Hajas, a psychotherapist who works with people who relocate abroad, said it’s common to experience depression, loneliness or grief in the first year or two after moving. 
“It happened to me 30 years ago, and it happens to many clients of mine,” she said. 
Hajas said there’s a predictable sequence of events that can occur. 
First, it can show up as small irritations  like feeling annoyed with the bureaucracy or the transportation system. 
Then, it turns into critique. 
When people fail or make a mistake, they can become very emotional and blame the new culture and country. 
Start your day with essential news from Salon. 
Sign up for our free morning newsletter , Crash Course. 
“They start idealizing their old culture; suddenly things seem much nicer than when they lived at home,” she said. 
“When loneliness hits them and the lack of a social support system, they start resenting the locals and perhaps even avoid meeting them and isolate themselves.” 
In 2019, Zeni Bandy moved from San Francisco to Paris. 
While she loved the Bay Area, she felt like the culture was too focused on work. 
Instead, she was at a point in her life where she wanted to focus on building community. 
Since her husband at the time had previously lived in Paris and had family there, relocating to France made sense. 
Bandy had only visited Paris for a week before, but she didn’t expect culture shock would affect her as much as it did. 
“I hadn’t done much research; I just didn’t know what I was getting myself into,” Bandy said. 
“And I’m actually really appreciative that I didn’t, because I probably wouldn’t have done it if I would’ve known.” 
Bandy found the move immediately challenging  from trying to figure out how to buy a gym locker to discovering her preferred grocery store, every task felt like extra work. 
“Doing the most basic things was extremely daunting,” Bandy said. 
“It was a pretty isolating experience.” 
It wasn’t until she got pregnant and connected with the English-speaking parent community that she started to really see herself in Paris long-term. 
After her daughter was born, when there was a school shooting in the U.S., she thought about how, if she returned to the states, she would have to decide how to explain safety and gun violence to her daughter. 
“I remember thinking, so when we go back, do we teach her gun violence and being safe  or do we just wait and let the school do it?” 
she said. 
“Then I realized that I don’t have to make that decision.” 
Smalman said many Americans also struggle with losing a “piece of professional identity.” 
That was true for Hilary Hodge, who moved from Chicago to Paris in 2017. 
Her first couple of years abroad were fine, she said, but when she moved to a smaller city in the Loire Valley in France, she felt more isolated. 
She also struggled with how her professional life changed. 
Fortunately, she was able to work with a British therapist living in France to work through these emotions. 
Our Summer sale is on! 
Support Salon’s bold journalism. 
Annual members save 58% 
“She has helped me quite a bit reconcile letting go of what I thought my career trajectory was going to be and embracing a new one,” Hodge said. 
Smalman said the way she helps people process these emotions is through art therapy. 
First, she reads a poem. 
Then, a client is encouraged to create art. 
“It’s about giving a shape to what’s hard to say out loud,” she said. 
“Then we reflect together, often through journaling, on what came up.” 
It’s not about the outcome of the art, but rather an opportunity to reflect without judgement. 
“A space where they don’t have to hold it together or explain themselves,” she said. 
“To pause, create, and come back to who they are underneath all the change.” 
Mora said, for Americans considering a move abroad, it’s important to know there will be challenges  but there are also resources, and it will get easier. 
In addition to therapists, she said there are plenty of resources online and international centers to help people assimilate. 
“It’s not going to be easy, but given how much both my husband and I have gained from living here where there are so many human-centered policies, I say it was so beyond worth it,” Mora said. 
Read more 
about American culture 
Does American culture shame too much  or not enough? 
Moving abroad? 
Here’s how much it’ll cost 
The war that defined America 
The post The emotional turmoil Americans face after moving abroad appeared first on Salon.com . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 5.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.6%Salon: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Nicole Karlis: 2.1%Salon: 3.1%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 1.8%Nicole Karlis: 0.7%Salon: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 1.5%Nicole Karlis: 1.1%Salon: 1.0%Hindsight Bias1.5%This article: 2.8%Nicole Karlis: 0.9%Salon: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 1.4%Nicole Karlis: 1.6%Salon: 7.3%Framing Effect1.4%This article: 0.9%Nicole Karlis: 0.2%Salon: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.9%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.7%Salon: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.0%This article: 5.5%Nicole Karlis: 2.4%Salon: 1.4%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 3.3%Nicole Karlis: 0.8%Salon: 2.2%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 24.9%Nicole Karlis: 9.3%Salon: 10.8%Negativity Bias24.9%This article: 6.7%Nicole Karlis: 3.1%Salon: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias6.7%This article: 1.5%Nicole Karlis: 1.3%Salon: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Nicole Karlis: 0.5%Salon: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.6%This article: 1.1%Nicole Karlis: 0.8%Salon: 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.6%Salon: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.6%Salon: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 3.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.1%Nicole Karlis: 2.5%Salon: 3.1%Appeal to Authority10.1%This article: 6.0%Nicole Karlis: 2.3%Salon: 2.3%False Dilemma6.0%This article: 1.3%Nicole Karlis: 0.3%Salon: 1.5%Slippery Slope1.3%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 25.7%Nicole Karlis: 8.3%Salon: 10.6%Hasty Generalization25.7%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.2%Nicole Karlis: 2.3%Salon: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion9.2%This article: 1.3%Nicole Karlis: 0.3%Salon: 1.4%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 10.6%Nicole Karlis: 2.7%Salon: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.6%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.6%Nicole Karlis: 0.1%Salon: 0.6%Composition/Division0.6%This article: 11.8%Nicole Karlis: 3.3%Salon: 2.5%Anecdotal11.8%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.1%Nicole Karlis: 2.8%Salon: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.1%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.1%Nicole Karlis: 0.3%Salon: 2.1%Unattributed Quote1.1%This article: 1.2%Nicole Karlis: 0.3%Salon: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 1.1%Nicole Karlis: 0.7%Salon: 15.1%Biased Writer Voice1.1%This article: 3.3%Nicole Karlis: 0.8%Salon: 2.7%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.8%Salon: 7.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Karlis: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Nicole Karlis: 2.5%Salon: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

1245 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers49%attributed speech630writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Mora • 15 words • 100.0% coverageRuby Mora • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageThe Brookings Institution • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 30 words • 0.0% coverageEnikö Hajas • 28 words • 0.0% coverageEnikö Hajas • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageEnikö Hajas • 19 words • 0.0% coverageEnikö Hajas • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageZeni Bandy • 17 words • 0.0% coverageZeni Bandy • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageZeni Bandy • 10 words • 0.0% coverageZeni Bandy • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageZeni Bandy • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageZeni Bandy • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageHilary Hodge • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJanaline Smalman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Mora • 27 words • 100.0% coverageRuby Mora • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Mora • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ruby Mora

100%flagged-word coverage
132 attributed words21% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+20.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ruby Mora: 20.5%20.5%Quote-first Misdirection+11.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ruby Mora: 11.4%11.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.9 ptsWriter: 4.9%Ruby Mora: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Ruby Mora: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Ruby Mora: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.