Publication summary
77%96 analyzed articles/videos66,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salon results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 60,373 hits. Analysis detected 461,438 faulty-reasoning hits from 397,785 analyzed words across 96 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 58% (160 of 379 publications). This Salon is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Salon
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
58%Salon (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score96 analyzed articles397.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Publication 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate