Author summary
53% 3 analyzed articles/videos 307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tatyana Tandanpolie results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,105 hits . Analysis detected 8,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,173 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,199 of 6,628 authors). This Tatyana Tandanpolie is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Tatyana Tandanpolie
Author details
Total words: 9,173
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst