Author summary
64%11 analyzed articles/videos9,823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russell Payne results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 5,406 hits. Analysis detected 51,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,937 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,355 of 6,299 authors). This Russell Payne is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Russell Payne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
31%Russell Payne (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 49,937
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles49.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.0%7.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate