Speaker summary
ā 25%1 analyzed article/video5,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Indoctrination, and Status Quo Bias, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 1.6% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 337 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,321 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (26,049 of 26,053 speakers). This Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.
Speaker details
Total words: 5,321
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Terms of Useā 2%
Brookingsā 1%5/10/2016, 1:57:29 AM