Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 21 Grams results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Availability Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 93 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (2 of 25,752 speakers). This 21 Grams is worse (more manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
21 Grams
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
0255075100100.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos