Brookings⁠33%

Contact Brookings | Brookings ⁠2%

6/5/2023, 8:08:36 PM

Topics: Contact
Keywords: Page

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (21,656 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the article peer group.

For all inquiries, please use our contact form or reach out directly to the appropriate department listed below. 
______________________________________________________________ 
Reach Out Directly 
The Brookings Institution 
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW 
Washington, DC 20036 
202.797.6000 
Research Programs 
Economic Studies 
202.540.7721 
Governance Studies 
202.540.7724 
Foreign Policy 
202.238.3134 
Metro 
202.238.3139 
Global Economy and Development 
202.540.7753 
Media Inquiries and Speaker Requests 
brookings.edu/for-media 
202.797.6197 
Permissions Requests 
brookings.edu/permissions 
Donations and Sponsorships 
brookings.edu/support-brookings 
202.797.6220 
Events and Conferences 
brookings.edu/events 
Book Store Orders and Proposal Submissions 
Research Library and Archives 
brookings.edu/research-library-and-archives 
202.797.6240 
Careers and Benefits 
brookings.edu/careers 
Executive Education Courses WashU at Brookings 
brookings.edu/washu-at-brookings 
202.797.6276 
Website Support 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Brookings: 4.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 4.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 3.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 5.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 2.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 21.0%Brookings: 2.3%Indoctrination21.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brookings: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Brookings: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.0%

100 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers40%attributed speech60writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Brookings • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBrookings • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageThe Brookings Institution • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThe Brookings Institution • 4 words • 0.0% coverageThe Brookings Institution • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThe Brookings Institution • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageBrookings • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brookings

69%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words73% of attributed speech20% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Indoctrination+57.1 ptsWriter: 5.0%Brookings: 62.1%62.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.1 ptsWriter: 15.0%Brookings: 6.9%6.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.