Author summary
53% 3 analyzed articles/videos 847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Gomez results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,096 hits . Analysis detected 5,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,859 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,385 of 6,192 authors). This Jim Gomez is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Jim Gomez
Author details
Total words: 7,859
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst