Publication summary
79% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NBC New York results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 3,558 hits . Analysis detected 20,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,559 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 42% (223 of 382 publications). This NBC New York is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 26,559
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles26.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.4% 13.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst