Tag: Extreme Weather – NBC New York ⁠82%

7/20/2026, 1:46:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 742 faulty-reasoning hits from 230 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,901 of 20,850 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the article peer group.

Wildfire smoke kills tens of thousands of people a year. 
Here's how it attacks the body 
Latest Forecast From Storm Team 4 
Tornadoes, dangerous winds, flash flooding threaten Saturday: See hourly radar breakdown 
Severe flooding slams Kerrville after Guadalupe River rises over 16 feet 
Texas flash floods leave at least 2 dead, hundreds rescued in region devastated a year ago 
Tornado seen in San Antonio 
Photos show Jersey Shore hospital flooded following heavy rain 
BJ's roof collapses as New Jersey floods; NYC streets under water 
New Jersey flash floods leave streets underwater. 
See the incredible scenes 
New Jersey battered by weekend storms 
Amid extreme heat wave, don't use fans indoors if it's above this temperature, experts warn 
Heat adds to strains on data centers, raising temperature on AI debates 
This air conditioning strategy is the sweet spot for saving energy and money, experts say 
NYC on brink of ‘heat emergency': Mamdani urges New Yorkers to stay indoors 
Extreme heat warning blankets NYC area; It could feel as hot as 111 degrees outside 
Hottest days since 2012? 
Upcoming NYC heat wave to bring deadly feels-like temps 
Beat the heat: How to recognize and treat heat stroke 
100 degrees this week? 
NYC could jump into triple digits in July 5-day heat wave 
Extreme heat hits as we approach the July 4th holiday: What to know 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%NBC New York: 0.9%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 8.3%NBC New York: 0.8%Anchoring Bias8.3%This article: 25.7%NBC New York: 3.2%Availability Heuristic25.7%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%NBC New York: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 40.0%NBC New York: 6.2%Framing Effect40.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.0%NBC New York: 1.5%Pessimism Bias17.0%This article: 43.5%NBC New York: 13.4%Negativity Bias43.5%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.6%NBC New York: 1.8%Recency Bias12.6%This article: 1.7%NBC New York: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.7%NBC New York: 6.8%Appeal to Authority18.7%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%NBC New York: 2.8%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.7%NBC New York: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion15.7%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.0%NBC New York: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.8%NBC New York: 0.1%Composition/Division4.8%This article: 3.9%NBC New York: 1.4%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 22.2%NBC New York: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)22.2%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%NBC New York: 0.1%Middle Ground6.5%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.0%NBC New York: 3.7%Unattributed Quote20.0%This article: 6.1%NBC New York: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 34.8%NBC New York: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice34.8%This article: 14.8%NBC New York: 0.9%Indoctrination14.8%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NBC New York: 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

230 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers11%attributed speech204writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
NBC New York • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageStorm Team 4 • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMamdani • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mamdani

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words50% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+89.7 ptsWriter: 10.3%Mamdani: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+67.2 ptsWriter: 32.8%Mamdani: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-22.5 ptsWriter: 22.5%Mamdani: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Mamdani: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.