Speaker summary
66% 29 analyzed articles/videos 1,073.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mamdani results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Overconfidence Bias , and Halo Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 3,188.732 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,073.333 analyzed words across 29 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (25,706 of 26,463 speakers). This Mamdani is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Mamdani
Speaker details
Total words: 1,073.333
Content count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score29 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 22.2% 22.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst