Author summary
68% 18 analyzed articles/videos 8,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josephine Stratman results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 4,969 hits . Analysis detected 41,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,925 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,469 of 6,138 authors). This Josephine Stratman is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Josephine Stratman
Author details
Total words: 42,925
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score18 analyzed articles42.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst