Author summary
54% 56 analyzed articles/videos 22,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rocco Parascandola results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 13,045 hits . Analysis detected 94,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 121,549 analyzed words across 56 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,655 of 6,357 authors). This Rocco Parascandola is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Rocco Parascandola
Author details
Total words: 121,549
Article count: 56
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score56 analyzed articles121.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst