Author summary
58% 36 analyzed articles/videos 16,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Annese results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 13,331 hits . Analysis detected 70,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 82,237 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,092 of 6,164 authors). This John Annese is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. John Annese
Author details
Total words: 82,237
Article count: 36
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score36 analyzed articles82.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst