Man shot to death day after 32nd birthday on upper Manhattan street ⁠16%

By John Annese⁠58%

6/28/2026, 6:56:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 254 faulty-reasoning hits from 177 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (17,902 of 21,172 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the article peer group.

A man was was shot to death on an upper Manhattan street early Sunday — the day after his 32nd birthday, cops said. 
Bryan Scott, who turned 32 Saturday, was shot in the chest near W. 207th St. and Ninth Ave. in Inwood about 4:25 a.m. 
Sunday, cops said. 
Medics rushed him to Harlem Hospital but he could not be saved. 
Scott lived in East Harlem, according to the NYPD. 
His killing marks the first homicide this year in the 34th Precinct, which saw three slayings in all of 2025, according to NYPD stats. 
Less than four hours earlier just four blocks away, a 22-year-old man was left clinging to life when he was shot in the neck. 
The victim was rushed to Harlem Hospital in critical condition after being shot at W. 207th St. and Vermilyea Ave. about 1 a.m., cops said. 
There is no immediate indication the two shootings are connected, an NYPD official said. 
No arrest have been made in either incident. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.9%John Annese: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%John Annese: 3.6%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic13.6%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%John Annese: 6.2%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect13.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.5%John Annese: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%John Annese: 16.0%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias13.6%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 3.9%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.6%John Annese: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias13.6%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.7%John Annese: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority14.7%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.3%John Annese: 9.3%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion20.3%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.8%John Annese: 4.3%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote28.8%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 1.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.6%John Annese: 5.4%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice13.6%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Annese: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

177 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers40%attributed speech107writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Scott • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 9 words • 100.0% coverageNYPD • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageNYPD • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

NYPD

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words67% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice+51.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%NYPD: 51.1%51.1%Unattributed Quote+22.8 ptsWriter: 26.2%NYPD: 48.9%48.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.