Topic summary
48% 40 analyzed articles/videos 12,833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shooting results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 5,148 hits . Analysis detected 43,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,287 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,763 of 16,562 topics). This Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Shooting
Topic details
Total words: 62,287
Article count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score40 analyzed articles62.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst