Publication summary
42% 26 analyzed articles/videos 11,363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These amNewYork results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 4,091 hits . Analysis detected 40,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,319 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 36% (256 of 398 publications). This amNewYork is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 57,319
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score26 analyzed articles57.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst