Author summary
ā 42% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Russo-Lennon results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 606 hits . Analysis detected 4,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,951 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ā 43% (3,834 of 6,628 authors). This Barbara Russo-Lennon is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Barbara Russo-Lennon
Author details
Total words: 6,951
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst