Author summary
44% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dean Moses results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 5,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,477 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,198 of 6,628 authors). This Dean Moses is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Dean Moses
Author details
Total words: 6,477
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst