Author summary
⁠19%5 analyzed articles/videos5,978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Daly results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 775 hits. Analysis detected 8,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,788 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (5,999 of 6,170 authors). This Adam Daly is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Adam Daly
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠3%Adam Daly (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,788
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751002.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos