Author summary
77% 3 analyzed articles/videos 714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Stark-Miller results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 5,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,644 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,231 of 6,364 authors). This Ethan Stark-Miller is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Ethan Stark-Miller
Author details
Total words: 5,644
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst