Author summary
6% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Penington results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 748 hits . Analysis detected 4,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,817 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,625 of 6,359 authors). This Lauren Penington is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Lauren Penington
Author details
Total words: 11,817
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst