Author summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelly Bradbury results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 842 hits . Analysis detected 6,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,073 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,856 of 6,171 authors). This Shelly Bradbury is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Shelly Bradbury
Author details
Total words: 8,073
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst