Denver DA seeks to charge boys, 12 and 14, as adults in car-theft killing 32%

By Shelly Bradbury69%

7/16/2026, 10:21:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 656 faulty-reasoning hits from 592 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,952 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the article peer group.

Denver District Attorney John Walsh will seek to try a 12-year-old boy and a 14-year-old boy as adults in the killing of a 33-year-old man in Sunnyside who police say was slain when he confronted the boys as they tried to steal or break into his vehicle last month. 
Both boys are charged with first-degree murder in the killing of Christopher Nabors on June 30, DA says 
The boys, whom The Denver Post is not identifying because they are children, each face numerous charges, including first-degree murder. 
Investigators believe the boys killed Christopher Nabors on June 30 in the 4300 block of North Pecos Street when the man confronted them as they attempted to either break into or steal his vehicle, according to the Denver Police Department. 
The two boys might also be connected to a second, similar homicide that happened in the 15000 block of East Olmstead Drive on June 24, police said. 
In that incident, 19-year-old Jacob Lopez was slain when he confronted would-be car thieves. 
Neither boy has been charged or arrested in connection with that homicide, and police said the investigation was ongoing. 
The two killings prompted Denver police to warn residents not to confront car thieves. 
They urged residents to instead call police. 
About 15 minutes before killing Nabors, police believe the 14-year-old boy and two other juveniles were involved in a shooting near Park Avenue and East 20th Avenue in which a 15-year-old boy was wounded. 
The teenager survived, police records show. 
Investigators believe that shooting to be gang-related, according to records obtained by The Post. 
All three of the juveniles, including the 14-year-old boy, have been charged or arrested in connection with that shooting. 
Trying the boys as adults would move their cases from juvenile court to Denver District Court, where they would face decades-longer prison sentences than if they were convicted as juveniles. 
There would also be more public access to court records and transparency about what occurred in the killing. 
Under Colorado law, children as young as 12 can be tried as adults. 
To do so for children younger than 16, prosecutors and defense attorneys present evidence about the crime and the child defendant during a transfer hearing in juvenile court. 
A juvenile court judge then considers the factors presented  including the seriousness of the crime and the child’s past criminal history  to decide whether the case should move to adult court. 
Prosecutors can file charges directly into adult court for children who are 16 or older. 
Including Nabors and Lopez, at least six people  including two children  have been killed during confrontations over car thefts in the metro area during the last six years. 
A 54-year-old man in Denver was slain when he followed his stolen vehicle in northeast Denver in 2021. 
A man in Aurora killed a 14-year-old boy and wounded a 13-year-old boy in 2023 after he chased them down because he believed they were attempting to steal his wife’s car. 
He was convicted of murder in 2025. 
Also in 2023, a 35-year-old man tracked his stolen car in Denver, then shot and killed 12-year-old Elias Armstrong, who was in the driver’s seat of the vehicle. 
That man was not charged with a crime. 
A man in Aurora was killed when he chased two people stealing scooters outside their home and the suspects opened fire on them in 2023. 
Sign up to get crime news sent straight to your inbox each day. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Shelly Bradbury: 3.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Shelly Bradbury: 7.1%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Availability Heuristic14.2%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Shelly Bradbury: 4.4%Baltimore Sun: 4.3%Framing Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Shelly Bradbury: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Shelly Bradbury: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.1%This article: 5.1%Shelly Bradbury: 10.4%Baltimore Sun: 7.6%Negativity Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 3.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.7%Shelly Bradbury: 3.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Recency Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.7%Shelly Bradbury: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Appeal to Authority4.7%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.6%Shelly Bradbury: 6.5%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Hasty Generalization9.6%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 3.6%Baltimore Sun: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.3%Shelly Bradbury: 5.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.3%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.0%Shelly Bradbury: 4.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Anecdotal12.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 1.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.2%Shelly Bradbury: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Unattributed Quote12.2%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.8%Shelly Bradbury: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice12.8%This article: 1.2%Shelly Bradbury: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Indoctrination1.2%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shelly Bradbury: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Shelly Bradbury: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

592 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers24%attributed speech448writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Walsh • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageThe Denver Post • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Police Department • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Police Department • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDenver Police Department • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageThe Denver Post • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words42% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+61.6 ptsWriter: 4.0%Denver Police Department: 65.6%65.6%Indoctrination+11.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Denver Police Department: 11.5%11.5%Biased Writer Voice-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Denver Police Department: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Denver Police Department: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.