Keyword summary
81%3 analyzed articles/videos1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Car Theft results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 1,477 hits. Analysis detected 8,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,111 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (9,808 of 35,459 keywords). This Car Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Car Theft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
73%Car Theft (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,111
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.3%15.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate