Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kowthar Shire results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,990 hits . Analysis detected 18,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,799 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,968 of 6,170 authors). This Kowthar Shire is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Kowthar Shire
Author details
Total words: 23,799
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score15 analyzed articles23.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst