Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Miller results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 3,185 hits . Analysis detected 32,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,810 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,708 of 6,348 authors). This Andrew Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Andrew Miller
Author details
Total words: 17,810
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.4% 15.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.0% 12.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst