Fox News89%

Patel turns tables on Walz in response to viral tweet on Minnesota fraud raids: 'Come again?' 71%

By Andrew Miller0%

4/28/2026, 8:04:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 64.2% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 497 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.2% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,549 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the article peer group.

Minnesota Gov. 
Tim Walz faced immediate backlash Tuesday after claiming credit for federal fraud raids in Minneapolis, prompting a sharp rebuke from FBI Director Kash Patel. 
The clash underscores growing political tensions over a sweeping probe into fraud that critics say unfolded under Walz’s watch, as federal authorities now take the lead. 
"Come again?" 
Patel posted on X in response to Walz, who claimed that Tuesday’s raids happened because Minnesota state agencies "caught irregular behavior and reported it." 
"This FBI and DOJ with our DHS partners drafted and executed every search warrant today. 
But go ahead and take credit for our work while we smoke out the fraud plaguing Minnesota under your governorship." 
Walz’s tweet, viewed over a million times in just a few hours, was widely panned by conservatives who pointed out that the massive fraud scandal unfolded under his watch and that the public pressure was ultimately what forced him to drop his re-election bid for governor. 
TOP 5 WILDEST MOMENTS AS GOP LAWMAKERS CLASHED WITH WALZ, ELLISON IN HEATED FRAUD HEARING: 'UNBELIEVABLE' 
"Arsonist masquerading as a firefighter," Townhall columnist Dustin Grage posted on X. 
"The main problem Tim Walz has now is that no one  Republican or Democrat  takes him seriously," Republican operative and Trump 2020 communications director Tim Murtaugh posted on X. 
"He’s proven that he’s that much of a boob." 
"The same guy who spent a whole hearing dodging questions about $9 BILLION in fraud in Minnesota and talking about ICE instead is now praising fraud control," the Republican-led House Oversight Committee posted on X. 
"Tomorrow, we will pass legislation in the Committee to make sure it never happens again. 
Sit this one out, Tim." 
MN LAWMAKER TAKES ACTION TO GET ANSWERS ON OMAR'S ALLEGED FRAUD TIES AFTER SHE SKIPS KEY HEARING: 'GHOSTED US' 
". 
@GovTimWalz is a stolen valor POS," Rep. 
Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., posted on X, referencing past criticisms of Walz’s military record that surfaced during the 2024 presidential campaign. 
"This is par for the course." 
"Well, the American people know we can actually thank @nickshirleyy and @VP," Sen. 
Rand Paul, R-Ky., posted on X. 
Others on social media pointed to an X post from the city of Minneapolis assuring citizens that it is not involved in the raids. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Federal authorities raided more than 20 locations, including childcare facilities, in Minneapolis on Tuesday as part of a sweeping fraud investigation into largely Somali-owned businesses, sources confirmed to Fox News. 
"Today the FBI with federal, state and local law enforcement is involved in court-authorized law enforcement activity as part of an ongoing fraud investigation," a Department of Justice spokesperson said. 
Authorities executed 22 federal search warrants in Minnesota on Tuesday morning as part of the operation, which is not immigration-related, sources said. 
Fox News Digital's Bill Melugin and Stephen Sorace contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 12.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 3.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 6.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.0%Andrew Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 9.3%Andrew Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias9.3%This article: 3.0%Andrew Miller: 5.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias3.0%This article: 29.4%Andrew Miller: 17.9%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect29.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 4.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.4%Andrew Miller: 13.8%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias30.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Andrew Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 3.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Andrew Miller: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Andrew Miller: 4.8%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem23.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 9.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.4%Andrew Miller: 14.4%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization7.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.3%Andrew Miller: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon9.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 7.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.3%Andrew Miller: 10.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.3%This article: 7.0%Andrew Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque7.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 3.8%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.3%Andrew Miller: 8.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice10.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 64.2%Andrew Miller: 15.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias64.2%This article: 1.6%Andrew Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

497 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers40%attributed speech297writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageKash Patel • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageKash Patel • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDustin Grage • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTim Murtaugh • 31 words • 100.0% coverageTim Murtaugh • 9 words • 100.0% coverageRepublican-led House Oversight Committee • 35 words • 100.0% coverageRepublican-led House Oversight Committee • 15 words • 100.0% coverageRepublican-led House Oversight Committee • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDerrick Van Orden • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDerrick Van Orden • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRand Paul • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tim Murtaugh

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words20% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +35.4 ptsWriter: 64.6%Tim Murtaugh: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.2 ptsWriter: 17.2%Tim Murtaugh: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Tim Murtaugh: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.