Keyword summary
76% 65 analyzed articles/videos 42,984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 22,775 hits . Analysis detected 187,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 194,966 analyzed words across 65 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,462 of 35,866 keywords). This Minnesota is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Minnesota
Keyword details
Total words: 194,966
Article count: 65
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score65 analyzed articles195K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst