Publication summary
72% 114 analyzed articles/videos 67,609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These newrepublic.com results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 55,530 hits . Analysis detected 422,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 357,120 analyzed words across 114 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (155 of 410 publications). This newrepublic.com is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. newrepublic.com
Publication details
Total words: 357,120
Article count: 114
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score114 analyzed articles357.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst