Publication summary
3% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capital B News results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 6,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,239 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (408 of 410 publications). This Capital B News is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 19,239
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 0.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst