Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mississippi Today results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 5,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,074 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,258 authors). This Mississippi Today is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mississippi Today
Author details
Total words: 7,074
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst