Alaska Removes Citizens From Voter Rolls Just Before Midterms 40%

By Hafiz Rashid68%

7/24/2026, 7:18:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 984 faulty-reasoning hits from 645 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.1% and a BS Rank of 40% (13,193 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the article peer group.

Alaska’s effort to appease President Trump’s claims that noncitizens are voting has ended up punishing U.S. citizens. 
The Alaska Beacon reported Thursday that the state removed 3,048 people from its active voter list, including many citizens who were accidentally flagged by the Alaska Division of Motor Vehicles and now have to provide extra identification to be able to vote. 
The director of the Alaska Division of Elections, Carol Beecher, told state legislators on Wednesday that “old data” was the reason for the mistake and that she wasn’t sure why so many Alaska residents were labeled as noncitizens. 
When Alaskans apply for a driver’s license, they are asked whether they want to register to vote and if they are a U.S. citizen. 
State election officials cross-check the DMV’s records with voter rolls each year, and according to Beecher, “more like 200 names” are typically tagged for extra scrutiny. 
The latest check found “a lot more names than we were expecting,” Beecher said. 
“We believe that when we did the match, that a lot of old data was picked up somehow. 
So we’re still ferreting through that,” Beecher said, adding that although the number of flagged names was “very concerning,” the state has to take them seriously. 
“It is not disenfranchising the individual from being able to vote, but it’s a measure the division has to take to make sure that we only have citizens voting.” 
Beecher said that those who were flagged will receive a letter asking if they are citizens, and that they merely need to contact the state Division of Elections by email, phone, or regular mail, and state they are a citizen. 
“We don’t require paperwork. 
We’re not requiring documentation. 
Nothing like that,” she added. 
Eligible U.S. citizens who were removed from the voter rolls disagree. 
Chris Waigl, who got her driver’s license in 2019 and became a U.S. citizen in 2025, was alarmed to check her registration status last weekend and find that she was listed as “inactive—non citizen.” 
“They were able to correct it there and then after I sent in copies of my naturalization certificate with a date before my voter registration date,” she told the Beacon via email. 
“It’s just ridiculous.” 
Waigl said she reached out to four others who became citizens at the same time as her, and three of them were removed from the voter rolls. 
One of them told the Beacon by phone that they were removed despite registering in person at a DMV office and presenting citizenship information. 
Some people told the Beacon that they haven’t been able to reach the Division of Elections by phone, and that mailboxes are full. 
Alaska’s primary elections are less than a month away on August 18, and the general election is less than two months away in November. 
The state’s lieutenant governor, Nancy Dahlstrom, is in charge of the elections office and has told state officials to comply with the Trump administration’s requests to turn over copies of Alaska’s voter rolls for a national voter database. 
But that national database, run by the Department of Homeland Security, has been found to be full of errors , mistakenly flagging U.S. citizens. 
One month ago, U.S. 
District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan struck it down, saying that the government “haphazardly” created a database of millions of Americans it knew was “inaccurate.” 
“States have partnered with the federal government to access the database and are actively removing United States citizens from voter rolls based on inaccurate information,” Soonam wrote in a 75-page ruling . 
“All in all, the federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote.” 
Between the Trump administration and zealous state governments like Alaska’s, thousands of U.S. citizens may not be able to vote in this year’s midterms. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.0%Hafiz Rashid: 7.5%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias5.0%This article: 2.8%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 14.4%Hafiz Rashid: 4.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic14.4%This article: 9.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic9.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Hafiz Rashid: 10.9%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 2.6%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Hafiz Rashid: 3.0%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias7.8%This article: 25.9%Hafiz Rashid: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 13.3%Negativity Bias25.9%This article: 3.7%Hafiz Rashid: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Hafiz Rashid: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.5%newrepublic.com: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Hafiz Rashid: 4.2%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 8.7%Hafiz Rashid: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope8.7%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Hafiz Rashid: 8.6%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%Hafiz Rashid: 6.1%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.6%Hafiz Rashid: 3.5%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.6%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.7%Hafiz Rashid: 3.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal16.7%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.3%Hafiz Rashid: 4.0%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote7.3%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.6%Hafiz Rashid: 14.6%newrepublic.com: 15.5%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 7.0%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

645 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers59%attributed speech264writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 26 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 26 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 40 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 4 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 4 words • 0.0% coverageCarol Beecher • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageChris Waigl • 34 words • 0.0% coverageChris Waigl • 32 words • 0.0% coverageChris Waigl • 3 words • 0.0% coverageChris Waigl • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageSparkle Sooknanan • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSparkle Sooknanan • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSparkle Sooknanan • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sparkle Sooknanan

100%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words21% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-17.8 ptsWriter: 17.8%Sparkle Sooknanan: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%Sparkle Sooknanan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.