Publication summary
17% 30 analyzed articles/videos 9,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WDET results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 3,489 hits . Analysis detected 32,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,752 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 20% (304 of 379 publications). This WDET is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 49,752
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score30 analyzed articles49.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst