Author summary
88% 2 analyzed articles/videos 235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tia Graham results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 286 hits . Analysis detected 1,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,761 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,769 of 6,261 authors). This Tia Graham is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Tia Graham
Author details
Total words: 1,761
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 16.2% 16.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst