Author summary
37%3 analyzed articles/videos1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hernz Laguerre results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,093 of 6,215 authors). This Hernz Laguerre is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Hernz Laguerre
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
35%Hernz Laguerre (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate