MichMash: Whitmer clashes with state Democrats after vetoing bills; MEDC revives economic development incentive 23%

By Hernz Laguerre40%

7/17/2026, 7:35:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 457 faulty-reasoning hits from 426 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,923 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the article peer group.

Tensions are high in Lansing among the Democrats with Governor Whitmer vetoing a series a bills from her own party. 
This week, on MichMash, WDET’s Cheyna Roth and Gongwer News Services’ Zach Gorchow unpack the 18 months of legal battles that led to this moment. 
Then later on, David Meninga, senior vice president for Community Development Programs & Execution at the Michigan Economic Development Corporation stops by. 
He talks about reviving the transformational brownfield program, a state incentive that ended a few years ago but will soon come back once Governor Whitmer signs bills that passed the Legislature on July 3. 
Subscribe to MichMash on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, NPR.org or wherever you get your podcasts. 
In this episode 
A breakdown of the 18 month saga of these nine Democratic bills that got ultimately got vetoed by Gov. 
Whitmer 
Possible reasons why Gov. 
Whitmer vetoed these bills. 
MEDC economic development plan 
In late 2024, as the Democratic trifecta in Lansing was about to end, several high-profile bills passed. 
There was legislation prioritized by unions, a key Democratic constituency, to have have local governments, school districts, colleges, universities and other public bodies pay a greater share of their employees’ health insurance premiums. 
There also was legislation enabling the state’s corrections officers in prisons to gain access to the State Police pension system. 
There were bills to allow for a regional property tax to provide funds for the Charles H. 
Wright Museum of African American History and the Detroit Historical Center, as well as relief from debt garnishment. 
Gorchow said after that the bills went no where. 
“Mysteriously  and this has never been explained  the nine bills containing these policies were never walked over to the governor’s office and formally presented to her for a signing decision. 
The bills remained somewhere on someone’s desk in the Legislature.” 
After 18 months of legal battles, the Michigan Supreme Court decided not to take the case, leaving in place a lower court ruling requiring the House to send the bills to the governor. 
About five hours later, the House complied with the courts and presented the bills. 
A couple hours later, the governor’s office sent out a veto letter indicating Whitmer had vetoed all nine bills. 
More from WDET: 
Detroit Evening Report: Whitmer says she is not running for president in 2028, but leaves door open 
MichMash: Gov. 
Whitmer reflects on her final state of the state 
MichMash: Michigan Senate passes significant action for economic development 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.5%Hernz Laguerre: 2.4%WDET: 1.7%Confirmation Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.1%WDET: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Hernz Laguerre: 0.9%WDET: 2.3%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.0%WDET: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.3%Hernz Laguerre: 0.4%WDET: 0.2%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.5%WDET: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Hernz Laguerre: 8.1%WDET: 4.7%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.7%WDET: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Hernz Laguerre: 7.3%WDET: 3.5%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 8.5%Hernz Laguerre: 1.5%WDET: 0.9%Pessimism Bias8.5%This article: 13.6%Hernz Laguerre: 3.9%WDET: 3.4%Negativity Bias13.6%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.8%WDET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.9%WDET: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Hernz Laguerre: 1.3%WDET: 1.2%In-Group Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Hernz Laguerre: 2.7%WDET: 5.6%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Hernz Laguerre: 2.1%WDET: 0.9%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.1%WDET: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 4.3%WDET: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.8%WDET: 3.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 3.8%WDET: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.8%WDET: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.8%WDET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.7%WDET: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.4%WDET: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.5%Hernz Laguerre: 0.3%WDET: 0.8%Unattributed Quote4.5%This article: 2.3%Hernz Laguerre: 0.9%WDET: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 12.2%Hernz Laguerre: 3.1%WDET: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice12.2%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 1.6%WDET: 2.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hernz Laguerre: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Hernz Laguerre: 7.0%WDET: 7.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.3%

426 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers43%attributed speech241writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Meninga • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Meninga • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGovernor Whitmer • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Economic Development Corporation • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageZach Gorchow • 9 words • 100.0% coverageZach Gorchow • 32 words • 100.0% coverageZach Gorchow • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMichigan Supreme Court • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGovernor Whitmer • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWDET • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGovernor Whitmer • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Senate • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Zach Gorchow

100%flagged-word coverage
51 attributed words28% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice+54.4 ptsWriter: 8.3%Zach Gorchow: 62.7%62.7%Unattributed Quote+37.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zach Gorchow: 37.3%37.3%Quote-first Misdirection+19.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zach Gorchow: 19.6%19.6%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Zach Gorchow: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.