Topic summary
68% 51 analyzed articles/videos 23,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 14,565 hits . Analysis detected 146,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 159,719 analyzed words across 51 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,462 of 15,492 topics). This Economics is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Economics
Topic details
Total words: 159,719
Article count: 51
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score51 analyzed articles159.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst