Publication summary
90% 10 analyzed articles/videos 427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cascade PBS results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 3,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,035 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (33 of 379 publications). This Cascade PBS is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,035
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 10.2% 10.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 17.7% 17.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 10.3% 10.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 10.2%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst