Publication summary
86% 15 analyzed articles/videos 692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cascade PBS results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 848 hits . Analysis detected 4,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,930 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (45 of 398 publications). This Cascade PBS is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,930
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.9% percentile 4.3% BS Score15 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 16.7% 16.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 8.1% 8.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 21.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 8.1%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst